Find the revenue your systems may be leaving behind.
Revenue slips through the gaps between contracts, approved work, change orders, pricing terms and invoices. The Revenue Leak Audit reconciles those records and delivers evidence-backed findings showing where billing may have broken down — and what your team should review next.
Apply for a Founding Client Audit- Founding Client Pilot
- $2,500 flat
- Availability
- First five qualified businesses
- Deliverable
- Evidence-backed audit report, PDF and application
Not in one system. In the handoffs between them.
A change order is executed but never reaches an invoice. Approved work is completed and billed short. A discount stays applied after it expired. A subscribed quantity rises and the billing does not follow. An escalation takes effect quietly.
None of these is a failure of accounting. Each one happens at a handoff, where the record that creates an obligation lives in one place and the record that discharges it lives in another. Nobody notices, because no single system holds both halves.
- 01Establish what should have been billable
Each contract is decomposed into the obligations that could produce revenue, with the records behind each one.
- 02Compare it against what was billed
Invoices and lines are reconciled against those obligations. The difference is a discrepancy, evidenced on both sides.
- 03Classify by what the records establish
Verified, probable, or needs review — and amounts that should not be called leakage at all are separated out and explained.
What the audit examines
Structured records you export. The audit reports what it can establish from what it is given, and states what it could not assess.
Contracts
Executed value, terms, and the obligations each one creates.
Change orders
Whether executed changes reached an invoice at all.
Invoices and lines
What was billed, against what the records establish was billable.
Payments
Settlement recorded against what was invoiced.
Work records
Billable, approved, completed work — and whether it was charged.
Pricing terms
The approved rate, and whether billing used it.
Billing milestones
Achievement status against what was invoiced for it.
Recurring charges
Subscribed quantity and rate against the period billed.
Escalations and renewals
Increases that took effect but never reached a bill.
Discounts and credits
Whether a reduction was authorised and still in force.
Retainage
Amounts earned and held, and the condition governing release.
The report distinguishes seven different things
A single number would be easier to sell and worth less. What makes a revenue audit credible is that it identifies what should not be called missing as carefully as what might be.
Verified
The records establish the gap, completely and unambiguously. This is the strongest thing the audit says.
Probable
The records indicate a gap, but one input reduces certainty. Confirming that input settles it.
Needs review
Something is inconsistent, but the records do not establish the amount. Reported as a count with an indicative value, and never counted as leakage.
Projected exposure
What a recurring billing condition would represent if it continued uncorrected. Not earned, not revenue, never added to the rest.
Not yet billable
Real contract value that has not become billable. Not missing — not due yet.
Withheld under contract
Earned, and held back until a release condition is met. Whether it is now due is a question about your contract, not one this system answers.
Not billable
Recorded work that does not become revenue at all.
Verified and probable detected leakage may be added together, and the report shows that sum. Nothing else may be. The report states this in its own words rather than leaving a reader to infer it from a layout.
See how findings, evidence and exclusions are presented
A complete 24-page Revenue Leak Audit report, generated by the engine from an invented dataset.
Crescent Synthetic Services LLC does not exist. Every contract, invoice and payment in this sample was invented to exercise the reconciliation rules, and no figure in it describes a real business or a real result. It shows how Logic Current presents findings, evidence, exclusions and recommended actions — which is the part worth judging before you engage us.
A report your CFO, controller or accountant can work from.
The deliverable is one report, produced from one model, so the PDF and the application cannot disagree. Every figure resolves to the records it came from.
Length follows the number of findings. The synthetic sample runs to twenty-four pages.
- Pre-audit qualification and scope review
- Supported-data readiness review
- Data validation and mapping
- Deterministic revenue reconciliation
- Human review of every ambiguous finding
- Revenue Leak Audit Report v1.0 — PDF and application
- Executive summary and Executive Action Plan
- Evidence-backed detailed findings
- Needs-review section, held separate
- Projected-exposure analysis where the records support it
- Amounts correctly excluded from leakage, each explained
- Process signals and root-cause observations
- Evidence traceability to source records
- A 60-minute findings review meeting
- One post-delivery clarification round
Who the founding pilot is for
The fee is fixed, so the scope has to be. These are the boundaries for the first five engagements — set from what the system supports today rather than from what we would like it to.
Ideal fit
The flat fee is set for engagements that look like this.
- You bill from contracts, change orders, milestones or approved work — not a flat monthly product fee
- Contracts, change orders and invoices can be exported to CSV
- Records carry stable identifiers, so an invoice can be tied to the contract it belongs to
- One organization, one analysis period, one currency
- Billing runs through one or two systems rather than many
- Someone internally can answer questions about how billing is meant to work
Requires manual scoping
Possible, but priced after a scoping conversation rather than at the flat fee.
- Revenue originates in three or more systems
- Identifiers differ between systems and need mapping
- Unusual or bespoke billing conventions
- A very large record volume, or an analysis period beyond 24 months
- Partial exportability, where some records live only in documents
Not supported today
We will tell you this rather than take the engagement.
- Records available only as PDFs, scans or paper
- More than one currency in a single reconciliation — no conversion is performed anywhere
- Direct connections to accounting or CRM systems
- Agreements that exist only in email threads or verbal variations
- Anything requiring an accounting or audit opinion
$2,500 flat. First five qualified businesses.
The fee covers the audit work and the deliverable: scope review, validation and mapping, the reconciliation, human review of every ambiguous finding, the report, and a findings meeting.
The fee is not a percentage of anything found, and it does not change with the size of the findings. That is deliberate: pricing on amounts found would create an incentive to classify aggressively, and the careful separation between verified, probable and needs-review is the part that makes this worth having.
Payment is due after scope acceptance and before intake. Founding Client pricing applies to the first five qualified engagements.
The audit may find nothing. It is an examination of the records you provide, and if those records reconcile cleanly the report will say so — at the same $2,500. A clean result is a real result, and it is not a refund condition.
No discrepancy is guaranteed, no amount of money is promised, and nothing is recovered, collected, corrected or invoiced on your behalf. There is no return-on-investment claim attached to this engagement, because the only honest one would depend on what your records turn out to contain. What you are buying is the examination and the evidence, not an outcome.
Before you apply
What is a Revenue Leak Audit?
A reconciliation. Logic Current takes the records that establish what should have been billable — contracts, change orders, approved work, pricing terms, milestones, recurring charges — and compares them against what your invoices show was actually billed. Where the two disagree, the audit reports the difference with the records behind both sides.
What records do you review?
Structured exports, as CSV, across fourteen categories: customers, contracts, change orders, invoices, invoice lines, payments, pricing terms, work records, billing milestones, credit notes, discounts, retainage, recurring charges and renewal terms. You do not need all fourteen — the audit reports what it can establish from what it is given, and says what it could not assess.
Do you guarantee you will find missing revenue?
No, and anyone who does is guessing. Some audits will find little. What you are paying for is the work and the deliverable: your records are reconciled, and you receive a report showing what was found, what was not, and the evidence for both. If the answer is that your billing is consistent, that is a real result and you will get it in writing.
Is every finding money I am owed?
No. A finding is a discrepancy between your records. Whether an amount is billable or collectable depends on your contract, your commercial relationship, and facts the records do not contain. The report says so on its cover, and every recommended action stops at confirming a position rather than telling you to collect.
What does “needs review” mean?
The records show something inconsistent but do not establish the amount — typically because billing that named no obligation could belong to more than one. These are counted with an indicative value and kept out of detected leakage entirely. A person has to resolve them; after that, one may become reportable, or may resolve to nothing.
What is projected exposure?
A forward-looking figure. If a recurring charge is being under-billed each period, projected exposure is what that condition would represent over the stated horizon if nothing changed. It has not been earned, is not revenue, and is never added to detected leakage.
How do you avoid double counting?
Explicitly, and it is one of the more important parts of the engine. A contract value governed by a billing schedule is represented by its milestones, not by both. Work performed under a change order is represented by that change order. Components whose value is already carried elsewhere are set aside and never appear in any total.
Is this an accounting audit?
No. It is not an audit opinion, not an accounting opinion, and not a statement of assurance. It is a reconciliation of the records you supply, delivered with the evidence.
Is this legal advice?
No. The audit does not determine entitlement, and no finding asserts that an amount is legally owed.
Do you use AI to calculate findings?
No language model participates in any monetary calculation or in classifying a finding. The engine is deterministic: the same records produce the same findings every time, and every explanation is composed from figures the engine already computed. That is a stronger property than an AI claim would be, and it is why the numbers can be traced.
What happens after the audit?
You receive the report and a 60-minute findings review, then one round of clarification. What you do with the findings is yours. If it becomes useful to run the reconciliation continuously rather than once, that is a separate conversation.
How long does it take?
We will give you a date at scope acceptance rather than before it. Turnaround depends on how much mapping your exports need, which is the part that does not scale with computing power. Founding Client engagements are deliberately limited to five so each one gets proper attention.
What if my data is messy?
That is common and it is part of what the qualification call is for. The importer rejects rather than guesses — an unparseable amount or an unknown column is reported rather than silently dropped — and a person resolves what it rejected. If your records are too incomplete for a reconciliation to mean anything, we will tell you that instead of taking the engagement.
Apply for a Founding Client Audit
This application collects scoping information only. If the engagement is a fit, we will arrange a qualification call, confirm scope in writing, and provide secure intake instructions at that point.
Secure intake is not open. Please do not attach or email contracts, invoices, exports or customer data. We will tell you exactly how to send records once the engagement is accepted and the handling controls are in place.
Prefer to talk first? Talk to Logic Current