REVENUE INTELLIGENCE

What you agreed to, what you delivered, what you actually billed.

Software that reconciles what a business agreed to, what it delivered, and what it actually billed — and shows where those three stop matching.

Start with a Revenue Leak Audit
Stage
Founding pilot
Entry
Revenue Leak Audit
Fee
Not contingent on findings
THE PROBLEM

Not in one system. In the handoffs between them.

Revenue rarely disappears inside one system. It slips in the handoffs between them: a change order approved in email, a pricing term agreed in a contract, work delivered and signed off, an invoice raised from a different record. Each system is internally consistent. Nothing compares them to each other.

Each system is internally consistent, which is why nothing looks wrong from inside any one of them. Reconciliation is comparison across all of them at once, and it is the kind of work that is straightforward, slow, and never the most urgent thing on anybody's week.

WHAT IT IS

A comparison, with the records attached.

It is software that reads the records a business already keeps, holds them against each other, and reports where they disagree. Not a dashboard, not a forecast, and not an accounting system — a comparison, with the underlying records attached to every finding so somebody can check the work.

WHAT IT EXAMINES, AND WHAT IT COMPARES

Records you already keep, held against each other.

Nothing here requires new record-keeping. The method is comparison across records that exist, which is exactly the work that is straightforward, slow, and never the most urgent thing on anybody's week.

01

What it examines

  • Signed contracts and the pricing terms inside them
  • Change orders and approvals, including ones agreed by email
  • Records of work delivered, completed, or signed off
  • Invoices raised, credits issued, and amounts collected
  • Rate cards, schedules of charges, and agreed discounts
02

What it compares

  • What the contract says a job is worth, against what was invoiced for it
  • Work recorded as delivered, against work that appears on an invoice
  • Approved change orders, against the invoices that should reflect them
  • Agreed pricing terms, against the rate actually applied
  • Totals across systems that should agree with each other and do not
03

What it can surface

  • Work that appears to have been delivered and never invoiced
  • Invoices raised below the rate the contract specifies
  • Approved changes that never reached a bill
  • The same work billed twice, or credited twice
  • Records that contradict each other, where a person has to decide which is right

Can, not will. Whether any of these exist in your records is the question the examination answers — it is not a prediction, and no amount is promised.

HOW AN ENGAGEMENT RUNS

Scope first, comparison second, evidence throughout.

The order matters. Agreeing what is in scope before anything is examined is what makes the exclusions in the final report honest rather than convenient.

01

Agree exactly which exported records are in scope, and which are not

02

Reconcile contracts, approved work, change orders, pricing terms and invoices against each other

03

Separate supported discrepancies from questions that need a person to answer

04

Attach the underlying records to each finding as evidence

05

State confidence, and state what the records could not show

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A report your controller can work from.

The deliverable is evidence, organized so that somebody with authority over the numbers can act on it or dismiss it on the merits.

Findings a controller or accountant can work from, each traceable to a record

An explicit list of what was examined and what was excluded

Confidence stated per finding rather than as a single headline number

The limitations of the examination, written down rather than implied

WHAT IT DOES NOT DO

The limits are part of the product.

A reconciliation that overstates what it proves is worse than none, because somebody will act on it. These are stated before an engagement rather than discovered during one.

01

It examines the records provided. It cannot see revenue that was never recorded anywhere.

02

A finding is a discrepancy supported by evidence. It is not a collectable amount, a legal position, or an accounting determination.

03

Nothing is recovered, invoiced, or corrected on a customer's behalf. The work product is evidence for the customer's own team and advisors.

PRODUCT, NOT A BUILD

Why this is not a custom engagement.

A custom engagement builds a system that does not exist yet, priced to the problem. Revenue Intelligence already exists: the reconciliation logic, the evidence model and the reporting are built, and an engagement applies them to your records. If the answer turns out to be a system your operation needs permanently, that is a custom project — and the audit is a sound way to find out before committing to one.

START HERE

Applying commits you to a conversation, not to an engagement.

We read your answers, tell you whether your records suit the examination, and give you a scope and a date before any fee is due. $2,500 flat for the first five qualified businesses, and the audit may find nothing.

Apply for a Founding Client Audit