Share the operational problem, platform idea, workflow, or existing system you need to improve. We use what you send to determine fit and to prepare for a focused conversation—not to add you to a mailing list.
We read what you send against project type, operational fit, and the investment range you have in mind.
A focused discussion about the operation: users, workflows, constraints, existing systems, and what success would look like.
Where the build is complex, we start with requirements, workflow mapping, and architecture as a defined engagement with its own deliverable.
Data model, roles, permissions, integration boundaries, and phasing are documented before development is scheduled.
A written plan covering scope, sequence, delivery phases, and what is explicitly out of scope for the first release.
Apply on its own page instead — the questions there are the ones that decide whether the audit suits your records. Apply for a Founding Client Audit. $2,500 flat, and the fee is not contingent on what the audit finds.
Custom engagements generally begin at $25,000. Larger multi-role, regulated, or integration-heavy platforms may require substantially more. A Revenue Leak Audit is a different kind of engagement at a published $2,500.
How the process runs today, who is involved, where it stalls, which systems are already in place, and what has to be true for the project to be worth doing.
Write to info@logic-current.com and include the same detail the form asks for.
Please keep your summary at a business level. Do not send passwords, health records, financial account credentials, or other sensitive personal information through this form. See our privacy notice for the current draft position on how inquiry information is handled.
Sign in to follow your engagement, answer our questions, and read your issued report. Access is by invitation only.
A short answer to each of these usually saves a round of conversation and makes the first call considerably more useful.
Custom engagements generally begin around $25,000. Multi-role, regulated, or integration-heavy platforms typically require more. If the requirement is smaller than that, we will usually tell you that configuring an existing product is the better commercial decision.
That is a reasonable place to start, and it is a question worth answering properly before anyone quotes a build. Send the workflow that is causing friction and we will help you work out whether the answer is custom, configuration, or integration.
No. Most organizations arrive with a problem rather than a specification, and defining the requirement is part of the work. A description of how the process runs today is more useful to us than a feature list.
Usually. Integration with payment platforms, CRMs, communication tools, scheduling systems, and internal APIs is a core part of what we do. Knowing which systems are non-negotiable helps us scope realistically.
The system assists, prepares, and organizes; a qualified person decides. We define the review threshold and the escalation path during architecture, and we do not make accuracy guarantees or compliance claims.
It is used to evaluate fit and prepare for a consultation. Please keep the summary at a business level and do not send credentials, health records, financial account details, or other sensitive personal information through this form.